Rove vs. Dean

1.) The first angle could dissect the recent historical contributions administered by these two men and weigh each man's political disposition against each other. It could be angled to address what each man is bringing to the debate, in order to adequately illustrate each man's unique perspective. This could potentially ground the center outside the actual debate enough to allow someone who hadn't seen it to write the story.

2.) The most basic story angle would cover the debate itself. This story would center wholly around what actually occurred in the debate and give the who, what, when, where and how of the event itself.

3.) Another angle could analyze the local public's reaction to the debate. The two debaters are sure to have an extremely polarizing effect on the community. Karl Rove's mere presence has prompted protest at multiple universities throughout the United States. Controversial figures such as these will undoubtedly elicit some kind of response, and this story has the potential to be written be somone who did not actually attend the debate.

4.) I'm not sure if Dean and Rove have had prior meetings up on the podium, but someone could analyze how this meeting compares to previous discourses they have held.

5.) The final angle could filter the debate down to the questions asked. It could expound upon what the questions reflect about the concerns of the community, and investigate how well the politicians' responses addressed these concerns.